Davis Memorial Hospital v. West Virginia State Tax Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \[t]he term 'includ[es]' in a statute is to be dealt with as a word of enlargement\ (quotations and citations omitted)
• recognizing that “statute should be so read and applied as to make it accord with the spirit, purposes, and objects of the general system of law of which it is intended to form a part”
• recognizing that “[t]he term ‘includ[es]’ in a statute is to be dealt with as a word of enlargement and this is especially so where ... such word is followed by ‘but not limited to’ the illustrations given.” (quotations and citations omitted)
• recognizing that \[t]he term 'includ[es]' in a statute is to be dealt with as a word of enlargement and this is especially so where ... such word is followed by 'but not limited to' the illustrations given.\ (quotations and citations omitted)
• recognizing that “[t]he term ‘includ[es]’ in a statute is to be dealt with as a word of enlargement and this is especially so where ... such word is followed by ‘but not limited to’ the illustrations given.” (quotations and citations omitted)
• “[t]he term ‘includ[es]’ in a statute is to be dealt with as a word of enlargement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).