Skip to main content
· 2/23/2010

State Ex Rel. Engel v. Dormire

Citations

  • 304 S.W.3d 120
  • 2010 Mo. LEXIS 18
  • 2010 WL 623655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant's discovery of cumulating instances where the State withheld the disclosure of evidence which could have been used to impeach a key witness permitted habeas review of defendant’s claimed Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963
  • holding habeas petitioner must establish that the grounds relied on were not known to him during direct appeal or post-conviction proceedings
  • entertaining successive habeas corpus petition alleging Brady violations following denial by circuit court and court of appeals
  • nondisclosure of impeachment evidence prejudicial per Brady ; witness was prosecution's key witness and defense hinged on undermining his credibility
  • even if the prosecutor is unaware of evidence uncovered by investigators, the State is under a duty to disclose that evidence because the investigators are part of the prosecution team
  • even if the prosecutor is unaware of evidence uncovered by investigators, the State is under a duty to disclose that evidence because the investigators are part of the prosecution team

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary R. Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.