Daniel Engel v. Robert Buchan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when read as a whole, the plaintiffs complaint contained enough specific factual allegations to state a plausible claim
• holding that the complaint was sufficient despite referring to “the defendants generally” be- cause the complaint alleged that defendants acted together
• holding that when read as a whole, the plaintiff's complaint contained enough specific factual allegations to state a plausible claim
• recognizing a Bivens remedy for alleged violations of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
• observing that “the ground has shifted under Bivens, shaking its doctrinal foundations,” but reasoning that, “shaky or no, Bivens remains the law, and we are not free to ignore it”
• extending Bivens into the “new” context of claims alleging violations of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).