Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 6/13/1990

State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Solove

Citations

  • 52 Ohio St. 3d 6
  • 17 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2241
  • 556 N.E.2d 439
  • 1990 Ohio LEXIS 248

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that gag orders imposed upon parties and their counsel are “considered a less restrictive alternative to restrictions imposed directly on the media”
  • recognizing that gag orders imposed upon parties and their counsel “are considered a less restrictive alternative to restrictions imposed directly on the media”
  • holding “no qualified right of public access to juvenile court proceedings . . . to determine custody of a minor child”
  • \The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that juvenile court proceedings have historically been closed to the public.\
  • “The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that juvenile court proceedings have historically been closed to the public.”
  • juvenile courts differ from courts of general jurisdiction in that “[hjearings are informal, and based on an inquisitorial model rather than an adversarial one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.