Ohio Supreme Court· 6/13/1990
State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Solove
Citations
- 52 Ohio St. 3d 6
- 17 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2241
- 556 N.E.2d 439
- 1990 Ohio LEXIS 248
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that gag orders imposed upon parties and their counsel are “considered a less restrictive alternative to restrictions imposed directly on the media”
- recognizing that gag orders imposed upon parties and their counsel “are considered a less restrictive alternative to restrictions imposed directly on the media”
- holding “no qualified right of public access to juvenile court proceedings . . . to determine custody of a minor child”
- \The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that juvenile court proceedings have historically been closed to the public.\
- “The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that juvenile court proceedings have historically been closed to the public.”
- juvenile courts differ from courts of general jurisdiction in that “[hjearings are informal, and based on an inquisitorial model rather than an adversarial one”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BloomerOhio Supreme Court· 2009-06-09· cited 203×
- Harrold v. CollierOhio Supreme Court· 2005-10-10· cited 197×
- In re C.S.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-09-27· cited 170×
- State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-25· cited 154×
- State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court· 2000-06-07· cited 126×
- State v. Grate (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-10· cited 117×
- In re J.D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-07-03· cited 83×
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. BondOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-24· cited 66×
- In Re Z.R.Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-08-20· cited 65×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-19· cited 64×
- McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. Keisha T.California Court of Appeal· 1995-09-07· cited 52×
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. DonaldsonOhio Supreme Court· 1992-03-11· cited 50×
- State ex rel. Allen Cty. Children Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Probate Div. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-10-20· cited 49×
- State ex rel. Doe v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2009-08-25· cited 47×
- In Re A.G.Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-06-09· cited 47×
- Interest of L.T. & D.T., minors, Appeal of: A.Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-04-07· cited 47×
- In Re TtNebraska Court of Appeals· 2009-12-08· cited 46×
- State ex rel. Steffen v. KraftOhio Supreme Court· 1993-10-06· cited 43×
- San Bernardino County Department of Public Social Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-07-12· cited 40×
- State v. Carnes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-08-15· cited 40×
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 1,951×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 1,798×
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 1,758×
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 1,561×
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,332×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,326×
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-03-03· cited 1,079×
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 938×
- Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1941-12-08· cited 874×
- Organization for a Better Austin v. KeefeSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 699×
- Kingsley Books, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 484×
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 452×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.