Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 10/20/1992
State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. Clausen
Citations
- 491 N.W.2d 662
- 61 U.S.L.W. 2268
- 1992 Minn. App. LEXIS 1036
- 1992 WL 293190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dentist's proffered reasons for refusing to treat an individual who had tested positive for HIV were merely pretext for discrimination where expert testimony established that any risk to patient or dentist was minimal as long as dentist used universal precautions
- a dentist's office is a place of public accommodation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huspeni, Lansing, Klaphake
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court· 1983-04-04· cited 2,660×
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-07-01· cited 1,003×
- Sigurdson v. Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-05-09· cited 187×
- Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-16· cited 49×
- Cain v. HyattE.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-04-03· cited 42×
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-02· cited 42×
- Blue Earth County Welfare Department v. CabelleroSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-12-20· cited 20×
- Lewis v. Remmele Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-17· cited 14×
- State, Department of Human Rights v. Hibbing Taconite Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-03-17· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.