D. Maryland· 12/17/2003
Start, Inc. v. Baltimore County, Md.
Citations
- 295 F. Supp. 2d 569
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22897
- 2003 WL 22966123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “there is no question that opiate addiction may qualify as an ‘impairment’ provided the addict is not currently using drugs”
- noting that “prospective patients [of a drug treatment facility] satisfied . . . definition of disability under the ADA”
- finding proposed methadone clinic had adequately alleged ADA violations for discriminatory application of zoning laws to prevent establishment of clinic
- “Numerous precedents establish that the administration of zoning laws is a ‘service, program, or activity’ within the meaning of the statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blake
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mary's House, Inc. v. North CarolinaM.D. North Carolina· 2013-09-30· cited 39×
- Clipse v. Commercial Driver Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-25· cited 37×
- CALVARY CHRISTIAN CENTER v. City of FredericksburgE.D. Virginia· 2011-07-18· cited 5×
- United States v. City of BaltimoreD. Maryland· 2012-02-29· cited 3×
- Center for Behavioral Health—Rhode Island, Inc. v. Westerly Zoning Board of Review Ex Rel. HenceD. Rhode Island· 2005-07-13
- Ronald Clipse, App/cross-resp V Commercial Driver Services, Inc., Resps/cross-appsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-08-25
- M. Rokita, Jr., & All Others Similarly Situated v. The PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-04-12
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2002-01-08· cited 1,389×
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 1,379×
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court· 1987-04-20· cited 1,128×
- Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court· 2002-06-17· cited 655×
- Gregory Fogleman v. Mercy Hospital, IncThird Circuit· 2002-03-18· cited 380×
- John Doe v. University of Maryland Medical System CorporationFourth Circuit· 1995-04-03· cited 315×
- Jay Lawrence Halperin v. Abacus Technology CorporationFourth Circuit· 1997-09-18· cited 279×
- John Doe v. County Of CentreThird Circuit· 2001-03-05· cited 247×
- Scott v. Greenville CountyFourth Circuit· 1983-09-14· cited 224×
- Susan Labram Bart Labram v. James HavelFourth Circuit· 1995-01-10· cited 211×
- Smith & Lee Associates, Inc. United States of America v. City of Taylor, MichiganSixth Circuit· 1996-12-16· cited 206×
- Debra Rogers v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance CompanyFourth Circuit· 1989-08-29· cited 201×
- Republican Party Of North Carolina v. James G. MartinFourth Circuit· 1993-01-05· cited 190×
- Sofia P. Pandazides v. Virginia Board of Education, Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus CuriaeFourth Circuit· 1994-01-14· cited 188×
- Mx Group, Inc. v. City of CovingtonSixth Circuit· 2002-06-12· cited 156×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.