Starnes v. Holloway

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a party waives alleged error regarding dominant jurisdiction unless a party raises the pendency of an earlier filed suit by a timely plea in abatement
• noting that “[g]enerally, only a final judgment can be 13 res judicata” and that “[a]pplication of collateral estoppel also requires that there be a final judgment”
• rejecting argument that violation of local rule regarding motions for consolidation rendered consolidation order void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).