Skip to main content
· 5/25/1966

Ackermann v. Vordenbaum

Citations

  • 403 S.W.2d 362
  • 15 A.L.R. 3d 893
  • 9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 428
  • 1966 Tex. LEXIS 307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to allow appeal of denial of motion for summary judgment following subsequent dismissal “could result in judgments which would be patently unjust”
  • holding that one may not challenge denial of summary-judgment motion in appeal from judgment rendered after trial on merits
  • noting that many of the same concerns would arise if the final judgment appealed from was one of dismissal
  • noting that many of the same concerns would arise if the final judgment appealed from was one of dismissal
  • holding that to allow an appeal of the denial of a motion for summary judgment following a subsequent dismissal or full trial on the merits “could result in judgments which would be patently unjust”
  • noting that many of the same concerns would arise if the final judgment appealed from was one of dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norvell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.