· 5/25/1966
Ackermann v. Vordenbaum
Citations
- 403 S.W.2d 362
- 15 A.L.R. 3d 893
- 9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 428
- 1966 Tex. LEXIS 307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to allow appeal of denial of motion for summary judgment following subsequent dismissal “could result in judgments which would be patently unjust”
- holding that one may not challenge denial of summary-judgment motion in appeal from judgment rendered after trial on merits
- noting that many of the same concerns would arise if the final judgment appealed from was one of dismissal
- noting that many of the same concerns would arise if the final judgment appealed from was one of dismissal
- holding that to allow an appeal of the denial of a motion for summary judgment following a subsequent dismissal or full trial on the merits “could result in judgments which would be patently unjust”
- noting that many of the same concerns would arise if the final judgment appealed from was one of dismissal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norvell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.