Stark v. Fifarek (In re Fifarek)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 69(a) mandates the practice and procedure of the State of Michigan be utilized to enforce or renew the prior bankruptcy court judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nova Express v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-01-22· cited 8×
• Fidelity National Financial, Inc. v. Friedman
  D. Arizona· 2012-03-02· cited 5×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council
  Supreme Court· 1993-01-12· cited 2,320×
• Pohutski v. City of Allen Park
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2002-04-02· cited 403×
• Albert J. Doherty v. American Motors Corporation, a Foreign Corporation
  Sixth Circuit· 1984-02-24· cited 195×
• Federated Publications, Inc v. City of Lansing
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 101×
• Volvo Commercial Finance LLC the Americas v. Gasel Transportation Lines, Inc. (In Re Gasel Transportation Lines, Inc.)
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-06-09· cited 55×
• State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-05-25· cited 30×
• Thickstun Bros. Equipment Co. v. Encompass Services Corp. (In Re Thickstun Bros. Equipment Co.)
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-06-02· cited 29×
• Green Oak Township v. Munzel
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2003-04-18· cited 23×
• Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Monarch Leasing Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1996-05-22· cited 18×
• Van Reken v. Darden, Neef & Heitsch
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2004-02-11· cited 17×
• Hoc, Inc. v. McAllister (In Re McAllister)
  N.D. Alabama· 1998-01-26· cited 14×
• In Re Harrison
  D. Kansas· 1995-08-23· cited 5×
• Lillie v. Hunt (In Re Hunt)
  W.D. Tennessee· 2005-05-03· cited 4×
• Reedy v. Reedy (In Re Reedy)
  E.D. Tennessee· 1999-10-05· cited 3×