Thickstun Bros. Equipment Co. v. Encompass Services Corp. (In Re Thickstun Bros. Equipment Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “jurisdictional framework that applies in bankruptcy cases is frequently confusing and difficult to apply”
• noting that it is only-necessary to determine whether the matter is “related to” the bankruptcy to decide whether the matter is within the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction
• stating that Pacor provides the “seminal definition” of related to proceedings
• con-eluding jurisdictional analysis need only determine whether the matter is at least “related to” the bankruptcy
• the bankruptcy court has jurisdiction to interpret and clarify the terms of a confirmed chapter 11 plan
• “Retention of jurisdiction provisions . . . do not alter the overall scope of the bankruptcy court’s post-confirmation jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).