Supreme Court of Alabama· 8/18/1978
Stanley v. American Fire & Cas. Co.
Citations
- 361 So. 2d 1030
- 1978 Ala. LEXIS 1922
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting Tilley analysis that focused on brewing coffee as the activity in question
- “supervising children on a regular basis for compensation is ordinarily a business pursuit”
- “The provision does not lend itself to clarity, resulting in a split of opinion over whether it is ambiguous with the consensus that it is poorly worded.”
- $3.00 per day held to be sufficient compensation for \business pursuits\ exclusion to apply
- \We are in accord with the several authorities that the exclusionary provision [virtually identical to the one here] is poorly worded and could have been written with more specificity. Yet when applied to these facts we do not find it ambiguous.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Almon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. BoylanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-01-22· cited 256×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-28· cited 89×
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court· 1994-05-11· cited 71×
- Northern Security Insurance v. PerronSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-05-04· cited 55×
- Haley v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-07-22· cited 34×
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Fantozzi Ex Rel. FantozziE.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-03-19· cited 33×
- Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-07-01· cited 31×
- Amco Insurance v. BeckSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-12-20· cited 29×
- Moncivais v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1988-10-19· cited 29×
- Myrtil v. Hartford Fire InsuranceE.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-04-15· cited 28×
- Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-01· cited 20×
- Foster v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1982-08-31· cited 19×
- Rocky Mountain Casualty Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-12-26· cited 18×
- Wickner v. American Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-31· cited 18×
- Luneau v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-03-24· cited 17×
- McCloskey v. Republic InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-29· cited 16×
- Republic Insurance v. PiperD. Colorado· 1981-07-01· cited 16×
- Robinson v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1979-08-20· cited 16×
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. KelseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-03-14· cited 15×
- Zulpo v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2007-04-11· cited 14×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court· 1971-06-17· cited 188×
- Gulf Insurance Company v. TilleyN.D. Indiana· 1967-06-13· cited 69×
- Gulf Insurance Company v. Ronald Tilley, Carol Jo Tilley, Marcella Smith (A Minor), Patricia A. SmithSeventh Circuit· 1968-03-05· cited 58×
- Martinelli v. Security Insurance Co. of New HavenMissouri Court of Appeals· 1972-11-21· cited 57×
- Fadden v. Cambridge Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court· 1966-09-05· cited 50×
- Home Insurance v. AurigemmaNew York Supreme Court· 1965-03-15· cited 41×
- Mansfield v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-06-30· cited 27×
- Long v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-10-18· cited 12×
- Tropical Coach Lines, Inc. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida· 1962-12-05· cited 6×
- McDougall v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court· 1971-06-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.