Skip to main content
· 3/24/2000

Luneau v. Peerless Insurance

Citations

  • 750 A.2d 1031
  • 170 Vt. 442
  • 2000 Vt. LEXIS 36

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an inquiry that requires the court to determine the nature of a party’s conduct and whether that conduct fit an insurance policy exclusion was a mixed question of law and fact
  • explaining that parties to a homeowner's policy would not reasonably expect coverage for the different legal duties and the greater risk associated with business activities
  • explaining that parties to a homeowner’s policy would not reasonably expect coverage for the different legal duties and the greater risk associated with business activities
  • exclusion applied when insured, engaged as disc jockey at wedding, knocked over negligently stacked speakers when he got into fight with one wedding guest about song insured had forgotten to play, injuring another wedding guest
  • exclusion applied when insured, engaged as disc jockey at wedding, knocked over negli- gently stacked speakers when he got into fight with one wedding guest about song insured had forgotten to play, injuring another wedding guest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.