Fourth Circuit· 7/15/1975
Stanley Eugene Crawford v. United States
Citations
- 519 F.2d 347
- 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 13696
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \the dis- trict court was not required to conduct an evidentiary exploration of the truth of an allegation in a § 2255 motion which amounted to no more than a bare contradiction of statements made by [the petitioner] when he pleaded guilty\
- \[T]he accuracy and truth of an accused's statements at a Rule 11 proceeding in which his guilty plea is established are 'conclusively' established by that proceeding unless and until he makes a reasonable allegation why this should not be so.\
- \[T]he accuracy and truth of an accused’s statements at a Rule 11 proceeding in which his guilty plea is accepted are ‘conclu- sively’ established by that proceeding unless and until he makes some reasonable allegation why this should not be so.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winter, Craven, Russell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Edgar Sterling LemasterFourth Circuit· 2005-04-11· cited 366×
- United States v. Gavin Roderick White, A/K/A Joe WhiteFourth Circuit· 2004-05-04· cited 158×
- United States v. Mohammed Y. ButtFirst Circuit· 1984-03-30· cited 105×
- United States v. Sidney J. Dickler, Richard R. Petrucci. Sidney J. Dickler, in No. 94-3517. Richard R. Petrucci, in No. 94-3518Third Circuit· 1995-08-21· cited 99×
- Herman Mathew via v. Superintendent, Powhatan Correctional CenterFourth Circuit· 1981-02-26· cited 82×
- United States v. James Earl Fleming, Jr., Henry Lee Fleming and Tommie Earl MillenderSeventh Circuit· 1979-06-11· cited 81×
- United States v. I. H. Hammerman, IIFourth Circuit· 1975-10-29· cited 71×
- United States v. William Ivon TurnerFourth Circuit· 2004-11-16· cited 64×
- United States v. Tommy Lee WhitleyFourth Circuit· 1985-03-29· cited 58×
- Cotton v. HuttoEighth Circuit· 1978-06-15· cited 57×
- Anderson v. Warden of Powhatan Correction CenterSupreme Court of Virginia· 1981-09-11· cited 47×
- Wilbur Bell v. United States of America, United States of America v. James Earl SampsonFourth Circuit· 1975-08-11· cited 40×
- Robert Mitchell Edwards v. Warden Sam P. Garrison, Central Prison, Raleigh, N.C., and State of North Carolina, Donald Bynum Bass v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1976-03-01· cited 38×
- United States v. Harold Wellington Rapp, Harold Wellington Rapp v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1976-07-29· cited 36×
- John James Ouellette v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1988-11-23· cited 33×
- United States v. James Alfred GoodmanEighth Circuit· 1979-04-02· cited 30×
- Robert Melvin Mayes v. George W. Pickett, WardenNinth Circuit· 1976-07-09· cited 22×
- United States v. Tommy Lee WhitleyFourth Circuit· 1984-05-15· cited 20×
- United States v. David Lawrence Becklean, and Jack Henry Cordsen, Kenneth F. Brown and Mark CelloEighth Circuit· 1979-06-07· cited 19×
- United States v. Elsie Jean WilliamsEighth Circuit· 1976-06-03· cited 17×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,618×
- Roy Edward Raines v. United States of America, Michael Pasterchik v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1970-03-23· cited 628×
- Fontaine v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 297×
- Walters v. HarrisFourth Circuit· 1972-05-22· cited 77×
- Richard M. Sullivan v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1973-10-10· cited 30×
- United States v. Eneliko Fatu FaleafineNinth Circuit· 1974-01-25· cited 26×
- James Clark v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1960-06-24· cited 12×
- United States v. Darl Dee ParkerSeventh Circuit· 1960-11-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.