Stanley Eugene Crawford v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the dis- trict court was not required to conduct an evidentiary exploration of the truth of an allegation in a § 2255 motion which amounted to no more than a bare contradiction of statements made by [the petitioner] when he pleaded guilty\
• \[T]he accuracy and truth of an accused's statements at a Rule 11 proceeding in which his guilty plea is established are 'conclusively' established by that proceeding unless and until he makes a reasonable allegation why this should not be so.\
• \[T]he accuracy and truth of an accused’s statements at a Rule 11 proceeding in which his guilty plea is accepted are ‘conclu- sively’ established by that proceeding unless and until he makes some reasonable allegation why this should not be so.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).