James Clark v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reconsidering earlier decision in light of Prince v. United States, 352 U.S. 322, 77 S.Ct. 403, 1 L.Ed.2d 370 (1957) and Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 79 S.Ct. 451, 3 L.Ed.2d 407 (1959)
• “The kidnapping stat- ute, Subsection 2113 (e) . . . was undoubtedly designed to provide a more severe penalty . . . for the bank robber who kidnaps to avoid apprehension for the commission of the offense of robbery . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).