Skip to main content

Stanfield v. Neubaum

Citations

  • 494 S.W.3d 90
  • 59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1495
  • 2016 Tex. LEXIS 578
  • 2016 WL 3536865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining whether judicial error can constitute an intervening or superseding cause in a malpractice action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyd, Brown, Coricurring, Devine, Green, Guzman, Hecht, Johnson, Lehrmann, Willett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.