Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 7/30/1998
Greathouse v. McConnell
Citations
- 982 S.W.2d 165
- 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 4913
- 1998 WL 437421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that although client alleged separate and distinct causes of action, crux of each claim was that attorney did not provide adequate legal representation
- noting that plaintiff’s DTPA cause of action against former attorney was impermissible attempt to “fracture” legal-malpractice claim into another cause of action
- complaint that lawyer misrepresented legal services would be of competent quality when they were not constituted a negligence claim and not a DTPA claim
- misrepresentations alleged as claims for breach of fiduciary-duty, fraud, breach of contract, and others, interpreted as claims for legal malpractice because complaint was that lawyer did not provide adequate legal representation
- when the crux of complaint is failure to provide adequate legal representation, the claim asserts legal malpractice
- complaint that lawyer misrepresented legal services would be of competent quality when they were not constituted a negligence claim and not a DTPA claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schneider, Wilson, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Levine v. KatzColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 327×
- Streber v. HunterFifth Circuit· 2000-08-04· cited 171×
- Goffney v. RabsonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-10-25· cited 124×
- Duerr v. BrownTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-07-03· cited 119×
- Jose L. Elizondo and Guillermina Elizondo v. Ronald D. Krist, the Krist Law Firm, P.C., Kevin D. Krist, and William T. WellsTexas Supreme Court· 2013-08-30· cited 118×
- Beck v. LAW OFFICES OF EDWIN J. TERRY, JR.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-05-01· cited 115×
- Murphy v. GruberTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-12-13· cited 106×
- Kimleco Petroleum, Inc. v. Morrison & SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-01-09· cited 96×
- Stanfield v. NeubaumTexas Supreme Court· 2016-06-24· cited 84×
- Wright v. SydowTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-11-24· cited 69×
- Swinehart v. Stubbeman, McRae, Sealy, Laughlin & Browder, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-06-07· cited 65×
- Williams v. BriscoeTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2004-03-18· cited 58×
- Trousdale v. HenryTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-06-24· cited 54×
- Aiken v. HancockTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-07-16· cited 53×
- Fields v. Teamsters Local Union No. 988Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-07-20· cited 49×
- Rangel v. LapinTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-04-28· cited 43×
- Grider v. Mike O'Brien, P.C.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-05-08· cited 42×
- In Re RamseyTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-08-03· cited 39×
- Hoover v. LarkinTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-04-27· cited 35×
- Finger v. RayTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-08-30· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.