Skip to main content
· 12/27/1978

Stanfield v. Laccoarce

Citations

  • 588 P.2d 1271
  • 284 Or. 651
  • 1978 Ore. LEXIS 1269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • normally, question whether an employee has acted within the scope of employment is a question of fact for the jury
  • “question of whether or not an employee has acted within the scope of his employment at any given time is normally a question for the jury, except in cases where only one reasonable conclusion can be drawn from the facts”
  • “question of whether or not an employee has acted within the scope of his employment at any given time is normally a question for the jury, except in cases where only one reason- able conclusion can be drawn from the facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, C.J., and Holman, Tongue, Howell and Linde

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.