· 12/27/1978
Stanfield v. Laccoarce
Citations
- 588 P.2d 1271
- 284 Or. 651
- 1978 Ore. LEXIS 1269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- normally, question whether an employee has acted within the scope of employment is a question of fact for the jury
- “question of whether or not an employee has acted within the scope of his employment at any given time is normally a question for the jury, except in cases where only one reasonable conclusion can be drawn from the facts”
- “question of whether or not an employee has acted within the scope of his employment at any given time is normally a question for the jury, except in cases where only one reason- able conclusion can be drawn from the facts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denecke, C.J., and Holman, Tongue, Howell and Linde
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.