Fearing v. Bucher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “ORCP 18 A requires a complaint to contain ‘[a] plain and concise statement of the ultimate facts constituting a claim for relief’ ”
• treating sexual assault as intentional tort for purposes of application of doctrine of respondeat superior
• discussing employer's vicarious liability for an employee's intentional tort of sexual assault
• applying respondeat superior doctrine to negligent supervision and training claims and finding that acts that were within the defendant’s scope of employment resulted in the acts that caused injury to plaintiff
• describing requirements to hold an employer liable for its employee’s torts
• describing requirements to hold an employer liable for its employee’s torts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).