Skip to main content
· 6/27/2008

Stancuna v. Sherman

Citations

  • 563 F. Supp. 2d 349
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49059
  • 2008 WL 2566750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although the Second Circuit does not appear to have expressly so held, a number of other circuits have held that government employees in their individual capacities are not in privity with their 17 government employer.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dominic J. Squatrito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.