District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/7/2008
Stancle v. State
Citations
- 980 So. 2d 619
- 2008 WL 1958684
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that where one prong of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is not met, such as prejudice, a court need not address the other prong, i.e. whether counsel was deficient
- explaining that where one prong of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is not met, such as prejudice, a court need not address the other prong, i.e. whether counsel was deficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hazouri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Arbelaez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-01-27· cited 82×
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-04-20· cited 62×
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-26· cited 61×
- Stancle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-07· cited 13×
- Stancle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-27· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.