Stamps v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant's confrontation rights were violated because he was unable to introduce evidence of prior false allegations to corroborate his theory that the victim-witness's mother instigated the entire incident
• concluding that defendant’s confrontation rights were violated because he was un able to introduce evidence of prior false allegations to corroborate his theory that the victim-witness’s mother instigated the entire incident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Higgs v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2010-01-14· cited 80×
• Abbott v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-07-13· cited 36×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Delaware v. Van Arsdall
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Pickard v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1978-11-10· cited 9×