Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/9/1898
Stahn v. Catawba Mills
Citations
- 53 S.C. 519
- 31 S.E. 498
- 1898 S.C. LEXIS 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding complaint stated basis for excusing demand where it alleged four of seven members of board were involved in self-dealing, and where self-dealing board member appointed two other “dummy” directors to board by purchasing stock in their name
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carolina First Corp. v. WhittleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-10-30· cited 14×
- Columbia River Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1917-01-16· cited 6×
- Grant v. GosnellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-03-10· cited 4×
- Morris v. Unity Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1942-05-14· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.