Carolina First Corp. v. Whittle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding shareholders did not comply with Rule 23(b)(1) because their complaint did not contain allegations regarding what they demanded and what the board of directors rejected
• noting the shareholders only alleged in their complaint that they demanded “certain information” and “certain actions” and made a “supplemental demand”
• affirming dismissal based on failure to allege compliance with state demand requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).