W.D. Missouri· 10/13/1993
Stafford v. State
Citations
- 835 F. Supp. 1136
- 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14746
- 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,141
- 65 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 646
- 1993 WL 418404
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prejudgment interest could not be recovered on damages awarded for embarrassment and humiliation in an action under § 1983
- dismissing Title VII and Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA) claims against supervisory employees in their individual capacities
- dismissing MHRA claims against supervisory employees in their individual capacities
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bartlett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Saville v. Houston County Healthcare AuthorityM.D. Alabama· 1994-05-12· cited 50×
- Keenan v. AllanE.D. Washington· 1995-05-12· cited 39×
- Maudsley v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-02-27· cited 37×
- Smith v. Capitol City Club of MontgomeryM.D. Alabama· 1994-04-12· cited 33×
- Jones v. ClintonE.D. Arkansas· 1998-04-01· cited 29×
- Wilson v. Wayne CountyM.D. Tennessee· 1994-05-24· cited 19×
- Redpath v. City of Overland ParkD. Kansas· 1994-06-09· cited 16×
- Jones v. ClintonE.D. Arkansas· 1997-08-22· cited 15×
- Schallehn v. Central Trust & Savings BankN.D. Iowa· 1995-02-17· cited 9×
- Murphy v. City of ElkoD. Nevada· 1997-10-06· cited 7×
- Schaffer v. Ames Department Stores, Inc.D. Connecticut· 1995-05-26· cited 7×
- Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc.D. Minnesota· 1996-05-18· cited 6×
- Accordino v. Langman Construction, Inc.S.D. Iowa· 1994-08-23· cited 5×
- Engle v. Barton County Memorial HospitalW.D. Missouri· 1994-09-22· cited 4×
- Coller v. STATE OF MO., DEPT. OF ECONOMIC DEVELOP.W.D. Missouri· 1997-02-13· cited 4×
- Carter v. Lutheran Medical CenterE.D. Missouri· 1995-03-15· cited 3×
- Seals v. State of Mo. Div. of Youth ServicesE.D. Missouri· 1994-09-30
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 11,385×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court· 1993-06-25· cited 8,844×
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 2,187×
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 1,521×
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaThird Circuit· 1990-02-08· cited 1,115×
- Annabelle Lipsett v. University of Puerto RicoFirst Circuit· 1988-10-26· cited 811×
- Busby v. City of OrlandoEleventh Circuit· 1991-05-17· cited 806×
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakNinth Circuit· 1993-04-19· cited 636×
- James JOHNSON and Benjamin White, Appellants, v. BUNNY BREAD COMPANY, AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1981-10-16· cited 358×
- Hortencia Bohen v. City of East Chicago, IndianaSeventh Circuit· 1986-08-28· cited 338×
- Melvin White v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee Schay, United States of America v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee SchayEighth Circuit· 1992-04-13· cited 256×
- Loyd S. DACE, Appellant, v. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1984-02-16· cited 207×
- Lucille R. Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., Autolite DivisionSixth Circuit· 1992-07-22· cited 205×
- Starrett v. WadleyTenth Circuit· 1989-05-22· cited 200×
- Barbara Sparks v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1987-10-20· cited 199×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.