Skip to main content

St. Paul Dredging Co. v. State

Citations

  • 259 Minn. 398
  • 107 N.W.2d 717
  • 1961 Minn. LEXIS 684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding in accordance with federal cases that absent an exculpatory clause in the subcontract a contractor can recover for losses sustained by its subcontractor
  • failure to procure the necessary cooperation of a third party to fulfill the state’s obligation to remove telephone poles did not excuse the state from performance, absent a specific contractual provision of excuse for that contingency
  • “It is well settled that a promise which cannot be performed without the consent or cooperation of a third party is not excused because of the promisor’s inability to obtain such cooperation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.