· 4/22/2005
Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of Dallas
Citations
- 407 F.3d 708
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6981
- 2005 WL 928593
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that substantial compliance is not the legal equivalent of strict compliance if the contract expressly calls for the latter
- determining that contract unambiguously placed risk of defective plans and specifications on contractor
- determining that contract unambiguously placed risk of defective plans and specifications on contractor
- summarizing Texas law on issue of whether owner or contractor bears risk of inaccurate or defective plans and specifications and applying it in diversity case
- summarizing Texas law on issue of whether owner or contractor bears risk of inaccurate or defective plans and specifications and applying it in diversity case
- “The court’s primary concern is to enforce the parties’ intent as contractually expressed, and an unambiguous contract will be enforced as written.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Clement, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.