Skip to main content
· 4/22/2005

Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of Dallas

Citations

  • 407 F.3d 708
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6981
  • 2005 WL 928593

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that substantial compliance is not the legal equivalent of strict compliance if the contract expressly calls for the latter
  • determining that contract unambiguously placed risk of defective plans and specifications on contractor
  • determining that contract unambiguously placed risk of defective plans and specifications on contractor
  • summarizing Texas law on issue of whether owner or contractor bears risk of inaccurate or defective plans and specifications and applying it in diversity case
  • summarizing Texas law on issue of whether owner or contractor bears risk of inaccurate or defective plans and specifications and applying it in diversity case
  • “The court’s primary concern is to enforce the parties’ intent as contractually expressed, and an unambiguous contract will be enforced as written.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Clement, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.