Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 6/28/2011

St. Charles Tower, Inc. v. Kurtz

Citations

  • 643 F.3d 264
  • 53 Communications Reg. (P&F) 829
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13167
  • 2011 WL 2535530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a state court can approve a consent order “overrid[ing] state law” only where there exists a “federal constitutional or statutory violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Gruender, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.