Eighth Circuit· 6/28/2011
St. Charles Tower, Inc. v. Kurtz
Citations
- 643 F.3d 264
- 53 Communications Reg. (P&F) 829
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13167
- 2011 WL 2535530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a state court can approve a consent order “overrid[ing] state law” only where there exists a “federal constitutional or statutory violation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Colloton, Gruender, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.