National Tower, LLC v. Plainville Zoning Board of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff must allege that each defendant personally 21 participated in the conduct alleged to have violated his constitutional rights
• observing that effective prohibition claim “present[s] questions that a federal district court determines in the first instance without any deference to the board”
• agreeing that a “non-contiguous” gap satisfied the first element of an effective-prohibition claim
• stating that “a board will not ordinarily receive a second chance”
• finding proper remedy for TCA violations in most cases to be order instructing board to authorize construction
• finding proper remedy for TCA violations in most cases to be order instructing board to authorize construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).