Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Willoth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• computer-generated diagrams showed that an adequate alternate site existed that zoning authority believed would have less negative visual impact on community
• district court relied on transcript of final findings made at zoning hearing to uphold denial of special use permit
• denial of variance application for three towers was proper where evidence demonstrated that one strategically located tower would be sufficient to eliminate gaps in coverage
• local authorities only violate the FTA by banning cell phone service if the proposed WCF was the least intrusive means for closing a significant gap in coverage
• denial of applications for system of three towers upheld where defendant demonstrated by substantial evidence that one centrally lo cated tower could provide same level of service
• denial of applications for system of three towers upheld where defendant demonstrated by substantial evidence that one centrally located tower could provide same level of service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Willoth
  Second Circuit· 1999-05-24· cited 139×
• Cellco Partnership v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission of Farmington
  D. Connecticut· 1998-04-13· cited 37×
• Primeco Personal Communications, L.P. v. Village of Fox Lake
  N.D. Illinois· 1998-11-19· cited 28×
• Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Town of North Stonington
  D. Connecticut· 1998-08-31· cited 26×
• Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. City of Scranton
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1999-01-26· cited 18×
• Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Mills
  S.D. New York· 1999-08-27· cited 13×
• Smart Smw of Ny v. Zoning Com'n, Town of Stratford
  D. Connecticut· 1998-06-17· cited 11×
• Site Acquisitions, Inc. v. Town of New Scotland
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-12-18· cited 11×
• City of Medina v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-02· cited 8×
• Sprint Spectrum v. Willoth
  Second Circuit· 1999-05-24· cited 6×
• New York SMSA Limited Partnership v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-08-03· cited 5×
• Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Amherst
  D. New Hampshire· 1998-08-21· cited 5×
• Omnipoint Comm. v. Town of Amherst
  D. New Hampshire· 1998-08-21
• Sprint v. Durham
  D. New Hampshire· 1998-08-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,180×
• Schad v. Borough of Mount Ephraim
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-01· cited 962×
• Consolidated Edison Co. v. Hoffman
  New York Court of Appeals· 1978-02-14· cited 101×
• BellSouth Mobility Inc. v. Gwinnett County, GA
  N.D. Georgia· 1996-08-13· cited 65×
• Cellular Telephone Co. v. Rosenberg
  New York Court of Appeals· 1993-11-18· cited 50×
• Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. City of Fulton
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1959-07-09· cited 6×
• Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. v. Lonergan
  New York Supreme Court· 1997-04-08· cited 1×