Skip to main content
· 2/19/1998

Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Willoth

Citations

  • 996 F. Supp. 253
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2143
  • 1998 WL 84602

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • computer-generated diagrams showed that an adequate alternate site existed that zoning authority believed would have less negative visual impact on community
  • district court relied on transcript of final findings made at zoning hearing to uphold denial of special use permit
  • denial of variance application for three towers was proper where evidence demonstrated that one strategically located tower would be sufficient to eliminate gaps in coverage
  • local authorities only violate the FTA by banning cell phone service if the proposed WCF was the least intrusive means for closing a significant gap in coverage
  • denial of applications for system of three towers upheld where defendant demonstrated by substantial evidence that one centrally lo cated tower could provide same level of service
  • denial of applications for system of three towers upheld where defendant demonstrated by substantial evidence that one centrally located tower could provide same level of service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Telesca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.