Skip to main content

Spokane County v. Utilities & Transportation Commission

Citations

  • 737 P.2d 1022
  • 47 Wash. App. 827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • service of notice on assistant attorney general assigned to Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission was not substantial compliance
  • “Noncompliance with a statutory mandate is not ‘substantial compliance^]’ ” holding service on the Attorney General’s office alone does not meet the requirements of the statute, even when that office has filed a notice of appearance on behalf of the agency named.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, McInturff, Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Spokane County v. Utilities & Transportation Commission

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.