Skip to main content
· 5/26/1987

Spokane County v. Utilities & Transportation Commission

Citations

  • 737 P.2d 1022
  • 47 Wash. App. 827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • service of notice on assistant attorney general assigned to Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission was not substantial compliance
  • “Noncompliance with a statutory mandate is not ‘substantial compliance^]’ ” holding service on the Attorney General’s office alone does not meet the requirements of the statute, even when that office has filed a notice of appearance on behalf of the agency named.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, McInturff, Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.