Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/26/1987
Spokane County v. Utilities & Transportation Commission
Citations
- 737 P.2d 1022
- 47 Wash. App. 827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- service of notice on assistant attorney general assigned to Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission was not substantial compliance
- “Noncompliance with a statutory mandate is not ‘substantial compliance^]’ ” holding service on the Attorney General’s office alone does not meet the requirements of the statute, even when that office has filed a notice of appearance on behalf of the agency named.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, McInturff, Green
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 133×
- City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 121×
- Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court· 2003-09-25· cited 120×
- Dougherty v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 2003-09-25· cited 119×
- Fay v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 94×
- Black v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-03· cited 47×
- Black v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-03· cited 47×
- Petta v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-12-07· cited 33×
- Crosby v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 1999-02-04· cited 31×
- Chaney v. FetterlyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-31· cited 19×
- Skinner v. Civil Service CommissionWashington Supreme Court· 2010-05-13· cited 18×
- Skinner v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'NWashington Supreme Court· 2010-05-13· cited 17×
- Fox v. Sunmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-12-20· cited 14×
- Fred Meise v. Michele Jaderlund, Grant County AuditorCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-03-08· cited 6×
- Black v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-16· cited 2×
- Jason Aguirre, V Kroger, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-05-19· cited 2×
- Spokane County v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-04-14
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re SaltisWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-24· cited 81×
- Nitardy v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1986-01-16· cited 42×
- Vasquez v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-07-17· cited 28×
- Reiner v. Pittsburg Des Moines Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1984-04-19· cited 24×
- Reeves v. Department of General AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-08-15· cited 22×
- Smith v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-06-13· cited 22×
- Tarabochia v. Town of Gig HarborCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-01-07· cited 21×
- Weber v. Colorado State Board of NursingColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-07-02· cited 18×
- Spokane v. LABOR AND INDUSTRIESCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-05-05· cited 16×
- Jones v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-19· cited 4×
Other cases named Spokane County v. Utilities & Transportation Commission
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.