Washington Supreme Court· 10/22/1998

Spokane County v. State

Citations

136 Wash. 2d 644
966 P.2d 305
1998 Wash. LEXIS 783
159 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rulings on permissive intervention are reviewed for an abuse of discretion
union members not required to exhaust administrative remedies before judicially challenging jurisdiction of Public Employment Relations Commission
union members not required to exhaust administrative remedies before judicially challenging jurisdiction of Public Employment Relations Commission
\An error of law is `an error in applying the law to the facts as pleaded and established.'\ (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Westerman v. Cary, 125 Wash.2d 277, 302, 892 P.2d 1067 (1994))
“An error of law is ‘an error in applying the law to the facts as pleaded and established.’ ” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Westerman v. Cary, 125 Wn.2d 277, 302, 892 P.2d 1067 (1994))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Durham, Johnson, Talmadge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.