Spielman v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the 11 administrative law judge’s determination that an expert’s statement, “[h]ow that relates to 12 his industrial injury, I feel is something for you to resolve,” was insufficient to establish 13 causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aguirre v. Indus. Comm'n of Ariz.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2019-08-15· cited 10×
• Teller v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-08-18· cited 9×
• Gilbert Aguirre Jr v. ica/city of Goodyear
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2019-08-15
• Michelle Sampson v. Surgery Center
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2021-07-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stephens v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-01-11· cited 61×
• Western Bonded Products v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-06-15· cited 42×
• Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-12-15· cited 39×
• Eldorado Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-12-16· cited 17×
• Estes Corporation v. Industrial Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-04-03· cited 9×
• State Compensation Fund v. Mohrman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-11-28· cited 6×