Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/11/1977

Stephens v. Industrial Commission

Citations

559 P.2d 212
114 Ariz. 92
1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 492

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

contrasting the failure to raise an issue before the ICA and the failure to raise specific alleged error in a request for review
claimant’s expressed desire in Request for Hearing to prove a permanent disability placed the issue before the Commission
“This court will not consider on review an issue not raised before the [ICA] where the petitioner has had an opportunity to do so.”
we limit our review of the ALJ’s decision “to the same matters which the [ALJ] could consider in [her] review of [her] own decision.”
in absence of specific request for review, appellate court limits review to matters extant in the record and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the award
issue as to percentage of disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Froeb, Haire

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Stephens v. Industrial Commission

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.