Spencer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that joyriding is a lesser included offense of larceny because, in spite of the phrase \without the intent to deprive\ in the joyriding statute, the only difference between the two statutes was that joyriding did not include the intent to steal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1998-09-21· cited 342×
• Howard v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 105×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1985-02-27· cited 58×
• State v. Hamm
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1981-02-17· cited 57×
• State v. Bailey
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 28×
• State v. Kamai
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-30· cited 19×
• In re Lakeysha P.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-28· cited 18×
• State v. Cornish
  Utah Supreme Court· 1977-08-10· cited 17×
• State v. Briley
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1981-03-06· cited 15×
• Ray v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1977-12-19· cited 9×
• Fuller v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1974-03-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Nace
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-09-15· cited 31×
• Liming v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1967-08-09· cited 28×
• State v. Eyle
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-12-24· cited 24×
• Good v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1878-09-15· cited 24×
• State v. Blotzer
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1972-03-10· cited 4×
• Prince v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1967-11-24· cited 1×