Commonwealth v. Nace

Citations

• 59 Pa. Super. 210
• 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 49

Syllabus

<p>Criminal law — Highway robbery — Evidence—Review.</p> <p>A conviction for highway robbery will not be reversed where it appears that although the defendant produced several witnesses to testify that at the time when the crime was said to have been perpetrated, the defendant was elsewhere, the prosecutor identified the defendant as the person who had robbed him, that there was fomid on the defendant after his arrest a marked note exactly similar to one which had been in the possession of the prosecutor, and that the defendant had been trailed by a bloodhound, trained for that purpose, from a place at the road about where the crime was perpetrated to his home.</p>