Spence v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the appellant’s conviction of unauthorized use on the grounds that he participated in the continued use of the stolen vehicle after the original taking
• “One is guilty of unauthorized use ... if he participates in the continued use of the stolen car after the original taking, since this manifests an intent to deprive the owner of his possession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Levon A.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-12-03· cited 12×
• In Re Levon A.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-17· cited 9×
• Banks v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-11-10· cited 6×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-11-30· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-05-11· cited 51×
• Anello v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1952-12-05· cited 46×