Spears v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he record supports a rational inference that appellant’s flight [from the police] was a result of his knowledge that the ear was stolen and the serial number removed”
• reversing a conviction under Art. 27, § 111, because \[w]e do not find evidence of a specific intent to cause damage\
• reversing a conviction under Art. 27, § 111, because “[w]e do not find evidence of a specific intent to cause damage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-24· cited 125×
• Richmond v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-26· cited 63×
• Teeter v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-11-07· cited 15×
• Davis v. Fowler
  D. Maryland· 1980-12-18· cited 12×
• People v. Steffens
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-02-07· cited 10×
• Pfeiffer v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-11-07· cited 9×
• In re Landon G.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-10-30· cited 1×
• Soet v. State
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-02-05