Sparshott, Shan v. Feld Entrtnmnt Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a party arguing that time limits were unfair must also show that he was prejudiced thereby”
• dismissing federal wiretap claim where there were \no incidents of wiretapping which occurred within two years of the plaintiffs' filing suit\
• finding abuse of discretion based on “wide disparity in time limits,” where one party “received a fraction of the time given to [the other party]”
• “The district court’s decisions on how to structure time limits are reviewable only for abuse of discretion.”
• “[W]here Congress has chosen a formula (‘reasonable opportunity to discover’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).