Space Systems/loral, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when development and verification are needed in order to prepare a patent application that complies with § 112, the invention is not yet ready for patenting
• “the patent statute requires an enabling disclosure of how to make and use the invention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-05-01· cited 27×
• Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2008-11-07· cited 15×
• Gemmy Industries Corp. v. Chrisha Creations Limited
  Federal Circuit· 2006-06-22· cited 14×
• Space Systems/loral, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2005-06-01· cited 10×
• Lear Automotive Dearborn, Inc. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 2007-11-02· cited 9×
• Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2004-11-12· cited 8×
• Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2002-03-11· cited 8×
• Emergency Fuel, LLC v. Penzoil-Quaker State Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-07-25· cited 4×
• Finnsugar Bioproducts, Inc. v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 2002-10-10· cited 2×
• Sparton Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2003-08-04· cited 1×
• Space Systems/loran v. Lockheed Martin
  Federal Circuit· 2005-04-20
• Power Integrations v. Fairchild Semiconductor
  D. Delaware· 2008-11-07
• Sparton Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2009-09-10

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1998-12-14· cited 353×
• Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1997-05-12· cited 283×
• Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., and Novopharm, Inc. And Novopharm, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 241×
• Alexey T. Zacharin v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2000-06-13· cited 85×
• Vanmoor v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2000-01-10· cited 58×
• Weatherchem Corporation v. J.L. Clark, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1998-12-07· cited 54×
• Brasseler, U.S.A. I, L.P. v. Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-08-16· cited 50×
• Abbott Laboratories v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Novopharm Limited, and Invamed, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-08-05· cited 35×
• Stx, Llc, (Formerly Known as Stx, Inc.) v. Brine, Inc., and Warrior Lacrosse, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2000-04-13· cited 29×
• Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. v. View Engineering, Inc., and General Scanning, Inc., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2001-05-07· cited 26×

Other cases named Space Systems/loral, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Space Systems/loral, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2005-06-01· cited 10×