Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “in ascertaining [the ordinary] meaning of terms we may consult “dictionary definitions and pertinent analysis in prior case law”
• noting that in ascertaining the meaning of statutory terms undefined by the legislature, “dictionary definitions . . . may be consulted”
• noting that a court interpreting undefined statutory terminology may consult dictionary definitions
• noting that a court interpreting undefined statutory terminology may consult dictionary definitions
• noting that questions of statutory law are reviewed de novo
• noting that questions of statutory law are reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).