Southern Ry. Co. v. Simpson
Citations
- 131 F. 705
- 65 C.C.A. 563
- 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4309
Syllabus
<p>1. Federal Courts — State Statutes — Construction—State Decisions — Conclusiveness.</p> <p>The opinion of a state court of last resort, construing a state statute, is conclusive on the federal courts sitting in such state to the extent only of the precise question decided.</p> <p>2. Railroads — Injuries at Crossings — Statutes—Construction.</p> <p>Shannon’s Code, §§ 1574-1570, requires every railroad company to keep some person on its locomotive always on the lookout ahead, and, when any person, animal, or other obstruction appears on the road, to sound the alarm whistle, put down brakes, and exercise every possible means to stop the train and prevent an accident, and renders a railroad company absolutely liable for an accident caused by a failure to comply therewith. Held, that such sections did not render the railroad company absolutely liable for a collision occurring in the daytime, while the engine was being operated backwards with the tender in front, and that the refusal of the court to charge that if the engineer was actually on the lookout ahead of his engine, and saw plaintiff’s vehicle as soon as it could have been seen, as it approached and entered on the crossing, and the engineer immediately blew the alarm whistle, put down the brakes, and used every possible means to stop the train and prevent the accident, plaintiff could not recover, though the engine was being operated backwards, was error.</p> <p>3. Statutory Obligation — Pleading—Amendment—Departure.</p> <p>Where a declaration in an action for injuries at a railroad crossing alleged that defendant wrongfully and negligently ran its engine and cars against plaintiff, when crossing its track in a lawful and prudent manner, it stated a cause of action at common law and under Shannon’s Code, §§ 157it-1576, requiring every railroad company to maintain a lookout ahead on the locomotive, etc., and rendering the company absolutely liable for damages occasioned by failure to comply with the act, though
Judges: Rurton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nichols v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Sixth Circuit· 1912-04-02· cited 27×
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Mrs. Josie S. Rochelle, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Giles M. Rochelle, DeceasedSixth Circuit· 1958-02-11· cited 24×
- Life & Casualty Insurance v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1927-02-05· cited 18×
- Rogers v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Sixth Circuit· 1905-04-14· cited 13×
- Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of PomonaNinth Circuit· 1909-08-07· cited 10×
- Graham v. EnglemannS.D. Texas· 1920-02-12· cited 9×
- Town of Franklin v. Hermitage Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1930-06-11· cited 7×
- Southern Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSixth Circuit· 1928-11-10· cited 5×
- Alabama Great Southern R. v. BrookshireSixth Circuit· 1948-02-09· cited 5×
- Philadelphia Nat. Bank v. RaffSixth Circuit· 1935-04-12· cited 4×
- Louisville & N. R. v. MayersTennessee Supreme Court· 1922-09-15· cited 4×
- Southern Railway Co. v. OwenTennessee Supreme Court· 1919-09-15· cited 2×
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. DavisSixth Circuit· 1908-05-14· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1821-03-18· cited 2,076×
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court· 1895-05-20· cited 221×
- Byrne v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.Sixth Circuit· 1894-04-03· cited 75×
- Blackwell v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1891-06-09· cited 30×
- Railway Co. v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court· 1891-05-21· cited 28×
- Railroad v. DiesTennessee Supreme Court· 1897-04-24· cited 23×
- Railroad v. PughTennessee Supreme Court· 1895-10-15· cited 21×
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. PrattTennessee Supreme Court· 1886-09-16· cited 16×
- Western & A. R. v. RobersonSixth Circuit· 1894-04-03· cited 16×
- Nashville & Chattanooga Railroad v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court· 1871-09-30· cited 12×
- Railroad v. McDonoughTennessee Supreme Court· 1896-09-22· cited 7×
- Southern Ry. Co. v. ElderSixth Circuit· 1897-07-06· cited 3×
- Routon v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1875-09-15· cited 2×
Other cases named Southern Ry. Co. v. Simpson
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.