Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 6/11/2007

Souther v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

  • 489 F. Supp. 2d 230
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying plaintiffs’ and defendant’s Daubert motions to exclude expert testimony
  • denying plaintiffs' and defendant's Daubert motions to exclude expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

105 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.