SOUTH MOTOR CO. v. Doktorczyk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the FDUTPA “cause of action accrued on the date of sale”
• “Section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1996), covers an action founded on a statutory liability, which would apply to Doktorczyk’s FDUTPA claim.” (quotation and brackets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.
  C.D. California· 2012-06-12· cited 43×
• Brown v. Nationscredit Financial Services Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-10· cited 7×
• Justice v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.
  S.D. Florida· 2016-04-27· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Combs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-28· cited 350×
• Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-03· cited 258×
• Miami-Dade County v. Omnipoint Holdings, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-09-25· cited 82×
• ARKY, FREED v. Bowmar Instrument Corp.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-12-22· cited 48×
• Delgado v. JW COURTESY PONT. GMC-TRUCK
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-21· cited 48×
• YUSUF MOHAMAD EXCAV. INC. v. Ringhaver Equip. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-07· cited 17×
• Auerbach v. City of Miami
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-24· cited 9×
• In Re Whittaker
  N.D. Florida· 1994-08-12· cited 6×
• MORNINGSIDE CIVIC v. City of Miami Com'n
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-21· cited 4×