YUSUF MOHAMAD EXCAV. INC. v. Ringhaver Equip. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \delayed discovery\ rule does not apply to FDUTPA and that the four-year statute of limitations applies
• holding that the delayed discovery doctrine is not applicable to actions for tortious interference with business relationships, defamation or unfair and deceptive trade practices
• holding that cause of action does not accrue against mentally incapacitated plaintiff when defendant's tortuous acts caused the delay in discovering cause of action
• holding that delayed discovery doctrine does not apply to tortious interference claims
• explaining that a plaintiffs cause of action under the FDUT-PA expired in 1994 because it was based on conduct that occurred in 1990

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).