· 4/25/2012
Sourcecorp, Inc. v. Norcutt
Citations
- 274 P.3d 1204
- 229 Ariz. 270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that equitable sub-rogation is permitted only if it will not materially prejudice the intervening lienholders’ interests
- holding that equitable subrogation is permitted only if it will not materially prejudice the intervening lienholders’ interests
- holding that equitable subrogation is permitted only if it will not materially prejudice the intervening lienholders’ interests
- stating that junior lienholder would receive a windfall by being promoted in priority unless homebuyers were equitably subrogated to the superior mortgage they paid off
- stating that junior lienholder would receive a windfall by being promoted in priority unless homebuyers were equitably subrogated to the superi- or mortgage they paid off
- noting that intervening lienholders remain in the same position after subrogation as before
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bales, Berch, Hurwitz, Pelander, Brutinel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.