Skip to main content
· 4/25/2012

Sourcecorp, Inc. v. Norcutt

Citations

  • 274 P.3d 1204
  • 229 Ariz. 270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that equitable sub-rogation is permitted only if it will not materially prejudice the intervening lienholders’ interests
  • holding that equitable subrogation is permitted only if it will not materially prejudice the intervening lienholders’ interests
  • holding that equitable subrogation is permitted only if it will not materially prejudice the intervening lienholders’ interests
  • stating that junior lienholder would receive a windfall by being promoted in priority unless homebuyers were equitably subrogated to the superior mortgage they paid off
  • stating that junior lienholder would receive a windfall by being promoted in priority unless homebuyers were equitably subrogated to the superi- or mortgage they paid off
  • noting that intervening lienholders remain in the same position after subrogation as before

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bales, Berch, Hurwitz, Pelander, Brutinel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.