Skip to main content
· 4/16/1993

Dietrich Industries, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 988 F.2d 568
  • 71 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1623
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7907
  • 1993 WL 93489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that a real estate purchaser could be equitably subrogated to a senior lien even though the purchaser partially paid the obligation because the senior lienholder released its lien and therefore would not suffer prejudice from subrogation
  • reasoning that full discharge of debt is required to prevent prejudice to “the senior lienholder’s attempt to collect the entire indebtedness secured by the senior lien” (citations omitted)
  • reasoning that full discharge of debt is required to prevent prejudice to “the senior lienholder’s attempt to collect the entire indebtedness secured by the senior lien” (citations omitted)
  • “Denying subrogation in this case would give the government an unearned windfall in that it would elevate the government’s liens for no good reason.”
  • permitting equitable subrogation without discussing whether purchaser was a volunteer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, King, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.