Court of Appeals of Arizona· 3/16/2026

Soto v. State

Syllabus

When a prosecutor almost exclusively used leading andclose-ended questions when presenting the case to the grand jury to the pointthe prosecutor testified and as a result avoided testimony about clearlyexculpatory evidence relating to the defendant's justification defense , should the superior court remand the caseto the grand jury for a redetermination of probable cause?

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Moody
Arizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 424×
United States v. Alfred Joseph Samango
Ninth Circuit· 1979-12-13· cited 143×
State v. Baumann
Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 72×
State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. II
Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-02-28· cited 64×
Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY.
Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-08-03· cited 49×
Samsel v. Allstate Insurance
Arizona Supreme Court· 2002-12-12· cited 23×
Maretick v. Jarrett
Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-01-21· cited 22×
United States v. Brito, Appeal of Vincente Carhuapoma, A/K/A \Vincente Carhuapoma Hartley\, and German Salcedo
Second Circuit· 1990-06-29· cited 20×
Prosise v. Hon kottke/state
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-09· cited 18×
Baines v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTY
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-05-10· cited 16×
State v. Mohajerin
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-12-29· cited 16×
Herrell v. Sargeant
Arizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-19· cited 10×
State v. Sanchez
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-03-22· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.