Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 3/23/2009

Sorenson v. Sorenson

Citations

  • 559 F.3d 871
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6097
  • 2009 WL 736009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the child habitually resided in Australia after living there for three years
  • finding habitual residence in Australia where the child moved to Australia with her family and their possessions, had spent most of her life in Australia, attended preschool and had friends in Australia, and spoke with an Australian accent
  • child’s habitual residence was the country where she “had spent the overwhelming majority of her life” and had “the majority of her connections”
  • “[A] person may have only one habitual residence.” (quoting Silverman v. Silverman, 338 F.3d 886, 898 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc))
  • “Determinations of intent [in the context of a Hague Convention petition] . . . involve questions of fact and the Court must defer to the district court’s findings unless they are clearly erroneous.”
  • “A person may have only one habitual residence . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Shepherd, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.