Sorensen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If there is a question as to the consistency of the statements, the proper place to divine the witnesses’ meaning is during cross-examination, not on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chapman v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2001-03-05· cited 65×
• Hannon v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2004-02-11· cited 61×
• Ryan v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-10-08· cited 51×
• Kolb v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1996-12-20· cited 46×
• Madrid v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1996-01-31· cited 41×
• Rigler v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 32×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 13×
• Trujillo v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1998-02-12· cited 9×
• Rogers v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-01-11· cited 8×
• Spence v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2019-05-16· cited 8×
• Ryan Lewis Hilyard v. The State of Wyoming
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2023-02-06· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dyas v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-07-25· cited 152×
• Scadden v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1987-02-05· cited 140×
• Griego v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1988-09-15· cited 89×
• Bishop v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1984-07-20· cited 86×
• Buhrle v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1981-05-13· cited 68×
• Dean v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1993-12-16· cited 51×
• Frenzel v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1993-03-26· cited 50×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-03-28· cited 32×
• Johnson v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1994-04-01· cited 13×